|
1
|
- ARTS Standards – Building Blocks for:
- SOA
- MDM
- E-commerce
|
|
2
|
- Welcome and Introductions Richard Mader - ARTS
- ARTS 2006 Accomplishments
- Master Data Management Cathy Mullis - Shell
- (Selecting and Implementing)
- SOA and Standards
- SAP Perspective
Tim Hood – SAP
- Oracle
Perspective Jerry Rightmer - Oracle
- Comparison Shopping
Engines Steven Roth - Channel Intelligence
- Plans for 2007
Richard Mader - ARTS
- Q&A
|
|
3
|
- Members
- 184 Total
- 46 New in 2006
- 41 Cancelled
- 112 Vendors
- 72 Retailers
- 42% International
|
|
4
|
- ARTS XML (formerly IXRetail)
- Comparison Shopping Engine (CSE)
- Product Content Management (PCM)
- Notification Event Architecture for Retail (NEAR)
- POSlog 2.2
- Announcing Today
|
|
5
|
- Requests for Proposal (RFPs)
- Master Data Management (MDM)
- Fully related to the Data Model
- Key to SOA and Data Syncronization
- Major Update to POS
- BIG Ideas Session (Tues. 11am EXPO HALL, 3D-05)
|
|
6
|
- 4th Annual RIS – IHL POS Survey
- Joe Skorupa and Greg Buzek
- Updated NRF-ARTS POS Request for Proposal
- Ann McCool and Richard Halter
- “How to” operate effective RFP Projects
- Dan Gray and Dennis Driscoll
|
|
7
|
- Data Model
- Release 5.1
- New Modification tracking software “Gemini”
- Standard Data Warehouse project launch
|
|
8
|
- UnifiedPOS
- Release 1.11
- RAPOS – defined
|
|
9
|
- Supporting Events:
- SOA Boot Camp – January 31, 2007 Orlando Fl.
- USA/Japan Leadership Forum
- Technology Summit – London
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Cathy Mullis - Retail Data Architect, Shell
|
|
12
|
- Master Data
- describes objects that drive the business, such as products,
vendors/suppliers, stores, distribution centers, customers
- supports operational data, which documents activities or transactions
that are created while doing business
- Master Data Management
- Is the process of creating and updating information according to rules
and procedures, ensuring quality standards
- Is supported by an accurate, timely “system of record” for the core
master data elements
|
|
13
|
- A business process that documents who, when, where and how data is
managed
- Quality standards to which the data can be held
|
|
14
|
- An MDM application or suite of applications that is dedicated to
managing master data
- A scorecard that measures the execution of business process, the
effectiveness of the organization and the quality of data
- A data architecture or integration strategy that ensures “data synch” or
data consistency across all applications
|
|
15
|
- Business benefits
- Enables automated, scheduled data synchronization
- Reduced effort to reconcile different versions of similar data
- Consolidation after mergers and acquisitions
- Ability to audit the process and data
- IT benefits
- Reduced effort to consolidate information
- Reduced effort to synchronize various copies
- Less complicated IT landscape
|
|
16
|
- As mentioned earlier, ARTS offers several standard Requests For
Proposal.
- The ARTS RFPs provide a range of standard requirements for a particular
subject area.
- The user can tailor the RFP by adding or removing requirements as
needed.
|
|
17
|
- Includes requirements to provide standard and allow customized
functionality that:
- enforce data quality rules
- perform data cleansing
- perform import / export of data
- support integration and synchronization with other applications
- support workflow, e.g. multiple steps and players in the process of
managing data
- provide robust reporting
|
|
18
|
- Tim Hood – VP Solutions Management, SAP
- Jerry Rightmer – VP Store Solutions, Oracle
|
|
19
|
- Tim Hood
- Vice President, Solution Management
- Store & Multi Channel
- SAP AG
|
|
20
|
- Enablement:
Application Systems expose their functionality as services based
on open standards
- Consumption:
A process, application, or program that is designed to make one
or more service calls to execute functionality exposed as web services
(as opposed to hard coded interfaces calls)
- Business value and ROI:
- Flexibility and rapid development through standardization and reuse –
frees up IT resources
- Ease of adapting existing processes to utilize new services – rapid
response to market forces and continuous process improvement
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- Oracle Retail
- Jerry Rightmer
- Vice President, Store Solutions
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
- Reusable business logic
- Reduce maintenance costs
- Provide consistency
- Enable alternate delivery of information
- Fits within larger process
- Application transparency
- Process Improvement
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
- Steven Roth
- Vice President of Product Management
- Channel Intelligence, Inc.
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
- CSEs are product search engines used to drive traffic to retailer sites
- General Audience: Shopping.com, Kelkoo, PriceGrabber, Shopzilla,
NexTag, Yahoo! Shopping, MSN Shopping, Ciao
- Targeted Audience: Gifts.com, CNET Shopper, HealthPricer
- One in three Internet shoppers visits a CSE in a typical month
- About 100 CSEs exist in the U.S. and Europe
- Most use a cost-per-click (CPC) pricing model
|
|
38
|
- The Problem:
- 54% of online retailers do not use CSEs, up from 26% the previous year
- Retailers that use CSEs frequently experience data and/or performance
issues
- Data exchange is complex due to differences in the requirements for
each CSE
- Effective data feed management is expensive
- The ROI is difficult to measure
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
- Introduced in Q3 2006 to facilitate the data exchange between online
retailers and comparison shopping engines (CSEs)
- 3 XML-based standards
- Delivery of product data to CSEs
- Error reporting from CSEs to retailers
- Click cost reporting from CSEs to retailers
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
- Improved ROI
- Click cost reporting will create transparency
- ROI can be measured and controlled
- Reduced IT expenses
- A single product feed could be used to advertise on dozens of CSEs
- Less time spent troubleshooting data feed errors
- Extensible structure for custom data requirements
|
|
43
|
- Increased revenue
- More retailers will use CSEs because of the ability to measure and
control the ROI
- Reduced IT expenses
- Data feeds from retailers will use a consistent format
- Retailers will be respond faster to data errors due to the improved
communication of these data issues
|
|
44
|
- Increased revenue
- Data standards allows third parties to focus on new value-added
services
- More retailers will outsource data services to third parties for these
value-added services
- Profitability analytics tools
- Automated bid management
- Real-time data delivery
|
|
45
|
- <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
- <CSE xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
- xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.nrf-arts.org/IXRetail/namespace/
../Schema/CSEV1.0.0.xsd"
- xmlns="http://www.nrf-arts.org/IXRetail/namespace/"
FixVersion="0" MajorVersion="1"
- MessageType="Response" MinorVersion="0"
ActionCode="Replace" SuccessfulReadFlag="true">
- <MessageID>1</MessageID>
- <DateTime>2006-09-29T09:30:47.0Z</DateTime>
- <Response ResponseCode="OK">
- <RequestID>2</RequestID>
- <ResponderID>9999</ResponderID>
- </Response>
- </CSE>
|
|
46
|
- Adoption of the standard by CSEs and retailers
- Refinement of the standard to address any weaknesses identified by
widespread use
- Expansion of the standard to include:
- Support for online marketplaces like Amazon
- Integration of product orders and order status between online
marketplaces and order processing systems
- CSEs that drive consumers to brick-and-mortar stores
|
|
47
|
- Data Model
- Data Warehouse
- Release 5.2
- Enumerations
- RFPs
- CRM
- WFM – Update, Thanks to C-Core
- Your request's)
|
|
48
|
- ARTS XML
- New Schemas
- Vendor
- Scale Management
- ProCon
- Existing Schema Clean-up
- Common Data
- Data Model Synchronization
- Logical Grouping (Message Sets)
|
|
49
|
- Special Projects
- SOA Blueprint for Retail
- Standard Services for Retail SOA
- Consolidated Meta Data Dictionary
|
|
50
|
- Continues SOA and RFP Education sessions
- Technology Summit, Europe
- USA-Japan Leadership Forum
- Network Dinners
- European Technology Council
|
|
51
|
- UnifiedPOS –
- Feb. 6 – 8 host BearingPoint Atlanta, GA
- May 22 – 24 host NRF Washington
DC
- August host Epson Long Beach
CA
- November host IBM Raleigh NC
- ARTS XML and Data Model
- Feb. 19 - 21 host SAP Phoenix AZ
- May TBD
- August host NRF Washington DC
- October TBD
- November TBD
|
|
52
|
- Download
- Data Model
- ARTS XML Schemas
- RFPs
- Learn
- Meeting/Event schedule and registration
- What’s New
|
|
53
|
|